theCEED.com - Research your Interests!!
  • MEMBERSHIP PROFILE
  • bar
  • No member information.
  • login_button
  • sign_up_button
no_image

Harvard open course : Justice

About the ceed

Site address : http://www.extension.harvard.edu/

* This literary work will be deleted in case the original author requires.
Recommend : 24 I Total List : 19 I 2015-05-30
favorite
Justice: What's The Right Thing To Do? Episode 07: 'A LESSON IN LYING' 2015.05.30 17:06:01
Nickname : 81. theceed Recommend : 1 View : 731 btn_recommend.png declaration

Please enter reasons of report.

declaration

 

 

PART ONE: A LESSON IN LYING
Immanuel Kants stringent theory of morality allows for no exceptions. Kant believed that telling a lie, even a white lie, is a violation of ones own dignity. Professor Sandel asks students to test Kants theory with this hypothetical case: if your friend were hiding inside your home, and a person intent on killing your friend came to your door and asked you where he was, would it be wrong to tell a lie? If so, would it be moral to try to mislead the murderer without actually lying? This leads to a discussion of the morality of misleading truths. Sandel wraps up the lecture with a video clip of one of the most famous, recent examples of dodging the truth: President Clinton talking about his relationship with Monica Lewinsky. 

PART TWO: A DEAL IS A DEAL

Sandel introduces the modern philosopher John Rawls and his theory of a hypothetical social contract. Rawls argues that principles of justice are the outcome of a special kind of agreement. They are the principles we would all agree to if we had to choose rules for our society and no one had any unfair bargaining power. According to Rawls, the only way to ensure that no one has more power than anyone else is to imagine a scenario where no one knows his or her age, sex, race, intelligence, strength, social position, family wealth, religion, or even his or her goals in life. Rawls calls this hypothetical situation a veil of ignorance. What principles would we agree to behind this veil of ignorance? And would these principles be fair? Professor Sandel explains the idea of a fair agreement with some humorous examples of actual contracts that produce unfair results. 

list
Comments

name

write a comment
TOTAL  1 Comments
name 2015-12-04 18:58:27
[now test this part.]

test now .
sorry now we are test here.
we will fast repair reply page. sorry
edit del